Showing posts with label mentor. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mentor. Show all posts

Sunday, November 21, 2021

"Pain is ALWAYS both physical AND emotional 100% of the time."

As a Sports Physical Therapist at Seattle Children's Hospital and a member of their Pain Medicine Team, I work with many kids experiencing chronic pain. Most often, that includes seeing teenagers who can't tolerate going to school, hanging out with their friends, or participating in their favorite extracurricular activities. Sometimes it's even worse: kids who haven't been able to put a shoe or sock on (or walk) for many months because of chronic regional pain syndrome, which means a very long road back to their previous level of function.  Their pain could have started long ago with an injury or illness, and will hopefully improve with graded exposure to movement while learning about pain.  These patients can experience massive improvement in their lives if things go well.  I'm not crazy enough to think I can help everyone, but I've grown to embrace this work, including when I can't help my patients break their pain patterns.  To help kids with chronic pain with any success has required a commitment to collaboration with other healthcare providers and dedication to learning about pain neuroscience and pain management. To do that, I read. A lot. 

I also read a lot when I'm preparing to give a presentation.  This week, I was invited to talk about Pain Neuroscience and the Pain Medicine Clinic to the Seattle Children's Regional Rehabilitation Team. I like presenting because it requires me to focus learning on a specific subject and makes me seek out new resources. Educating clinicians is very different than patient care and it helps me consider my own beliefs, biases, and treatment approach.  I was fortunate to be partnered with Hematology/Oncology Physical Therapist Dr. Jacob Ross, who spoke about the intensive Pain Rehabilitation Program (PReP) where I sometimes refer patients when they need more care than 1 or 2 hours per week in my clinic will achieve.  If you're seeing Jacob at PReP, you're undergoing rehab or mental health or some school work Monday through Friday from 8AM-4PM for anywhere between two and four weeks! Based on this website, there are 83 pediatric pain clinics around the world, mostly (65%) in the United States, existing in 25 states plus Washington, D.C.  That means half of the states and the majority of the world doesn't have this available at all - and if you consider that the states who do offer these type of services only have it in a small number of places, tons of kids with chronic pain have no access to this care! In Seattle, I've worked with families from Alaska, Montana, Idaho, and Washington - and there are probably patients from many more places that my team members have worked with. 

If you're interested in learning about pain, I recommend you start with the work of Lorimer Moseley.  I've previously written about his books: Explain PainExplain Pain Supercharged and the Graded Motor Imagery Handbook, and I wrote about hearing him lecture and meeting him at the University of Washington, here. The NOI Group, who published those books, announced a new one coming out in December, "Pain and Perception: A Closer Look at Why We Hurt" which will be my next pain-related read.  From a different perspective, I also wrote about The Gift of Pain, which describes what happens when people are without the ability to experience pain. You don't pull your hand away from a hot pan or stop walking on a broken leg if you can't experience pain - a very dangerous scenario.  If you came upon this post looking to learn about pain management, any of those resources would be great places to start, but they're more about educating clinicians and, though they may be helpful for patients, I've now read a workbook more specifically intended for patients and think it's a great addition to this list.  

$19.95 on Amazon!
In preparation for our presentation, Jacob asked if I had heard of Dr. Rachel Zoffness. "Why yes, Jacob, I have. I follow her on all the social media and listen to her podcast episodes (OMG listen here or here or here or definitely my favorite: here), and I just finished reading one of her books."  The Chronic Pain &Illness Workbook for Teens was published in 2019 and was the first new resource I read for my presentation. Dr. Zoffness is a Pain Psychologist who teaches for multiple higher education institutions, she is the Co-President of the American Association for Pain Psychology, and she is on the Board of Directors for the Society of Pediatric Pain. Oh, and she treats patients experiencing chronic pain and has written two books. (She also wrote The Pain Management Workbook which I'm currently reading.) She's also released an $80 Workshop "Foundations of Pain Psychology" and more from that series are coming soon! Hopefully I'm not starting to look like a creeper because I've been fan-girling and re-sharing all her posts, podcast episodes, and books, so writing a blog about her work is probably the icing on the cake. When you find someone who can directly impact your patient care and knowledge, with easily digestible tools and clear, consistent messaging, I think you have to tell everyone.   

If this is your first time reading one of my blogs, you might not know that I write to organize and synthesize information I'm learning to refer back to or share with others.  Today's post starts with a look at a few of my favorite points from Dr. Z's Teen Workbook paired with information from two of the research papers I read for my presentation and it wraps up with a look at another pain management workbook from Dr. Greg Lehman. 

If you're a person living with chronic pain OR a clinician who works with patients experiencing chronic pain, in-person multidisciplinary care is the best treatment option, but that isn't available or affordable or feasible for so many people. The Teen Workbook could be a solution for patients who need something they can do independently.  It doesn't replace physical therapy or mental health counseling (or the many other treatments that may be appropriate and necessary), but it can certainly help educate patents and initiate behavior change that may be life changing.  

Jull 2017
1) Let's start with my favorite quote from Dr. Zoffness:"Pain is ALWAYS both physical AND emotional, 100% of the time."  This is the biopsychosocial (BPS) model at its heart and connected well to this image from Jull 2017 that I spent a lot of time discussing in my presentation. The Jull paper is a commentary on the BPS model and shows the idea that 3 different patients may have different amounts of biological - psychological - and sociological needs.  But also, the same patient at time 1, time 2, and time 3 has different amounts of these domain needs, too.  Today, for example, I might have a mild headache and I'm hungry but my mental health is good and I got to spend some time with friends so my social bucket has been filled, but my biological bucket may need more attention (maybe a sandwich for my blood sugar).  Tomorrow, I might have eaten enough for breakfast but be stressed about my pain presentation at work and spending a longer day at the office missing out on game night with friends - so my biological needs have been met, but not the social pieces that keep me going. You can't just look at your patient and think they only need biological care or mental health care at your evaluation and then assume it stays the same for all of their treatment.  I

The Workbook is clear about the role of the mind-body connection with regard to pain and explains what parts of the brain are involved.  It provides concrete examples, intentional questions for patients to consider, and a roadmap of strategies to try to better understand your own pain triggers from each of the three circles and identify solutions to try to reduce your pain volume.  Some of the pain books I mentioned above were really complex but this one is, without question, the easiest to understand and most user-friendly option for the general population, particularly when considering teenagers.  Too often the "Bio" portion is treated alone, with Physicians and PTs attributing pain to tissue damage or disease, but that (biomedical) approach ignores two major domains that impact the patient's presentation (Psych and Social circles). The unity of physical and emotional care is essential to patient success and Dr. Zoffness is screaming this message from the rooftops for everyone to hear.  I'm happy to amplify her message as often as possible to whoever will listen.  I actually ask my patients  "How's your mental health today?  Anything stressful going on?  When are your exams?  Have you done anything fun with your friends lately?"  If it's OK to ask them how their ankle is after they've sprained it, it should certainly be OK to also ask these questions.  Clinicians: please consider adding this to your day to day interactions with family, friends, and patients - and I don't just mean handing them the depression questionnaire and glancing at it.  Look them in their eyes and ask them how they're doing.  And mean it!

Tale of Two Nails
2) Metaphors, Analogies, and Stories help teach pain. It's no surprise that Lorimer Moseley is a mentor to Rachel Zoffness (and Greg Lehman) because they all use many of these to get their points across. I presented a few in my talk, also, but have a few favorites I use with patients.  One example that I liked from the Teen Handbook is about practice.  Think about an activity you wanted to learn. She uses playing piano, but I'm using basketball. At first, your hands struggle to dribble without staring at the ball and using your palm instead of your fingertips and the ball might bounce off your foot or miss the rim when you take a shot.  As a novice the task is more difficult and requires more effort and concentration.  So you practice.  And over time, you get better and better, until at some point, you've stopped looking at the ball and can run while handling it and can make shots from farther away and your form looks more consistent as it becomes automatic.  Your brain has developed new patterns that have been repeated enough times that the task is now easy.  With chronic pain, you're unintentionally practicing pain and your brain develops patterns that make it easier or more automatic to have pain.  The beauty of this is that with the appropriate treatment, the pain and learning can change.  Another example Dr. Z has written about, is "The Tale of Two Nails" which tells two really great stories that can inform our understanding of pain - but you should read those directly from her - so check out the article or buy her other book, because it's in there!

When Dr. Z is talking about practicing pain, she's explaining central sensitization, a phenomenon that I previously was struggling SO MUCH to understand. Central sensitization is a common characteristic of chronic pain, where you have an increased response to sensory stimuli resulting in hyperalgesia (increased sensitivity/bigger pain response to the same sensory input) AND allodynia (painful response to something that is normally not perceived as painful like hurting when you're touched by a feather on your skin.) Your nervous system changes when you experience pain for a long time. 

For my presentation, this 2011 Clifford Woolf paper depicts normal sensation compared to central sensitization.

Normal Sensation: On the left side there is an input - either something noxious (potentially dangerous - top) or a light touch (feather, bottom). Notice the black arrows for the top path (pain) and the bottom path (touch) don't converge and the brown blob (brain) is the same color as the rest of the  nerves.
Central Sensitization: Here, the same sensory stimulus occurs at the far left, but now the black arrows merge to the same destination (brain) and the color has changed because the system has adapted resulting in hyperalgesia and allodynia responses. 

3) It's a workbook: there are pages for you to do work.  This isn't just a book of education about pain. This is a guide with explanation of a key pain-related concept followed by actionable items to help improve your experience.  Sometimes I feel like patients who have had pain for a really long time are desperate for a physical therapist to DO whatever we can TO THEM hoping to dull the pain for just a few minutes.  What we really need is to serve as a guide, showing patients what THEY can DO on their own to turn down the pain.  They have to take control of their lives and do the work for any success to occur.  Physical therapists in chronic pain management should be cheerleaders, rooting on our patients as they make 1% progress day after day. People don't need to be 100% to live their lives fully, and often a really small amount of progress gets the ball rolling for a lot more progress to occur. I don't think patients realize how much control they have over their pain until someone empowers them to trust the process and themselves to get moving.  

Link

So, let's say you like the idea of a workbook and want to have multiple options to choose from, or you're an adult and want something a little deeper into the science. As I mentioned, I haven't yet finished Dr. Zoffness's other book, but I expect it might target that audience a bit more. There's another workbook I really like and was using prior to reading Dr. Zoffness's book. Dr. Greg Lehman's "Recovery Strategies" Pain Guidebook is available for patients or clinicians to access online.  I've previously written about attending his "Reconciling Biomechanics with Pain Science" course here and have appreciated learning from him both at the course and from his online presentations and social media. 

The workbooks are similar in their intent and both include key focus on the BPS model, describe how pain works, and provide action items for you to follow.  And both have many metaphors, analogies, and stories.  In particular I liked his metaphor for what happens to the brain with chronic pain: Consider that our brain is like a map of our body, and that a good map would be really clear, showing all the roads and rivers, but that with pain, things get smudged, almost as if you've spilled coffee on the map and the details get a little fuzzy.  The details of our body can get a little fuzzy with chronic pain, but with exercise and movement, we can clean up the coffee mess and the map gets clearer.  Overall, though, they're really quite different.  Dr. Lehman's book is written as a series of infographics, almost a choose your own adventure graphic novel, where you can take a single page out of it to educate your patient.  It includes pages of mythbusters, examining common misconceptions about various topics like "bones out of place," or how tissue damage found on imaging like an MRI doesn't always correlate with pain.  I think Greg's goes into more detail on how pain processes occur, looking deeper into the science of the nociceptive system, the spinal cord, and the brain, but he also acknowledges that it's meant to be used for patient and provider together because of its level of complexity. 

Also, I think that because Greg is a biomechanist, chiropractor, and physiotherapist, his handbook comes through from a more musculoskeletal lens. Though he fully emphasizes the BPS model, he's more from a bio background and gives adequate attention to the other bubbles.  Rachel is a pain psychologist who comes from a more psycho-social background, and thoguh she gives adequate attention to the bio, it's super interesting to look at their two workbooks and consider how they're trying to reach the same outcome for patients from different angles.  I think that patients would absolutely benefit from both. 

That's all for now.  December's blog post is about grief.  It's another long one and recommends several books on that topic, too. So if you're looking for holiday gifts that are books on pain, start with Dr. Zoffness's books - or if grief books might help one of your loved ones, there are several being reviewed next month.  Stay tuned!

TL;DR:

1) "Pain is ALWAYS both physical AND emotional, 100% of the time." 

2) Your nervous system changes when you experience pain for a long time.  This is called central sensitization which is characterized by hyperalgesia and allodynia. 

3) Teaching people about why we have pain and how the pain process works has been shown to help improve pain.  Multiple resources are listed to learn more about pain, often using metaphors, analogies, and stories to demonstrate complex concepts and make them more easily understandable.

4) The biopsychosocial model indicates necessity in attention to the biological, psychological, and social domains in treatment of chronic pain. 


Thursday, November 21, 2019

The Level Up Initiative

with permission from the Level Up Initiative
The healthcare industry, including the field of physical therapy, is experiencing a revolution.  A paradigm shift. A wave of new thought. A reform. A change in perspective. An upgrade, in my opinion. Despite Dr. George Engel defining the biopsychosocial model in 1977, it has only recently become more common for clinicians to consider this form of practice. Chronic pain as a health condition is costing a ton of money in the US, and I think that this is one of the drivers for change. Healthcare providers and researchers are looking for ways to improve our treatment approach for people who are suffering.  The Level Up Initiative is trailblazing the path for young clinicians to better learn this model and tools for patient-client relations that the model inherently requires, which is not the typical model taught in healthcare education programs. If you're a physical therapist - new grad, student, or even a veteran - and you haven't heard of the Level Up Initiative, click that link and check it out.

Zak Gabor with me in 2017
I met Zak Gabor, founder of the Level Up Initiative, in November 2017 at his "Hip Hinge 101" course which I blogged about here. He included a patient case (who happened to be my friend from high school). She was experiencing low back pain and Zak showed her MRI along with cartoon images of a stick figure bending forward and an explosion coming out of its back. The MRI showed disc herniations and the patient had been told her back was "destroyed" and that she shouldn't bend over to pick up her kids. Imagine being a young mom with two active little boys and being told you can't pick them up because you could risk damaging your back! What would you do? When this type of message comes from a medical provider, a patient will often take the advice to heart and follow it with blind faith. This is why healthcare providers have a HUGE responsibility to consider the impact of the words we use with our patients. (Click here for JOSPT "Sticks and Stones" article on this topic.)

The Level Up Initiative strives to educate physical therapists (and other healthcare providers) on a biopsychosocial approach to patient care focusing on soft skills and therapeutic alliance in addition to the anatomical tissue healing factors and movement patterns we learn in school. The goal is to teach clinicians ways to interact with their patients with critical thinking, to connect, to prioritize using positive language and a growth mindset, and to focus less on a medical diagnosis and more on the whole person. Increased consideration for mental health and psychology, far more than what I learned in PT School is a factor of the paradigm shift.  My school taught the biomedical model with primary consideration of anatomy and biomechanics without much attention to the psyche or nutrition or sleep or a whole host of other stressors that impact our patients.  Most schools are just like this, though as the shift continues, more programs are giving attention to these considerations.

Ellie leading our Mentorship Group
As a company, The Level Up Initiative puts out content on various social media outlets including Facebook and Instagram posts, as well as having a podcast, a recently initiated blog, and a free mentorship program. I participated in the third cohort of their mentorship program where my mentor was Ellie Somers, owner of Sisu Sports Performance. ***Sign up for the next cohort NOW!  Enrollment ends November 24, 2019*** I enjoyed my experience working through this program and wanted to explain what it was like for those who are unfamiliar with it. Again, I can't recommend checking out their website strongly enough. It has impacted my patient care in only positive ways and I hope I'll have the chance to serve as a mentor in their program in the future.

The mentorship program lasts four months and, as already mentioned, is free. Free! These skills will immediately impact your patient care, but you have to put in the effort to go through their materials. They send you the full course syllabus in advance which outlines the recommended books, podcast episodes, TED talks, and publications to go through over the program and you can really dive in at your own pace. The course is organized with themes that help to focus the group discussions, but going out-of-order with the reading didn't impact my experience.  I chose to complete all the tasks on the syllabus, but I could see that if your schedule didn't allow for that, you could take it as a reading list to work through in the future while still getting a lot out of the discussions and watching the modules.

I won't tell too many details about the specific resources because you should participate in it to get the full experience, but I do want to share some of my favorite parts and describe the structure hoping that it will encourage you to sign up for their next cohort (HERE). The three key topics explored in the mentorship program are Growth Mindset, Critical Thinking, and Communication. Even as a PT for the past five years, I learned new things with each topic, and regularly wished I could have had this knowledge as a new grad. Each topic had discussions amongst our assigned mentorship group as well as reflection questions to consider for personal growth.

Photo from Module 1 with permission from Level Up
Module 1 examined "Growth Mindset."  If you're not familiar with this concept, start reading about it! Once I learned it, I could easily identify when this was an issue with a patient and there are some simple strategies on how to approach this problem to optimize patient care. Our group had an awesome discussion about failure during this module. I personally have experienced some professional failures this year... I submitted a manuscript for publication that was rejected, worked on a project for the WNBA that seemed to crash and burn.  With a growth mindset, I can look at those failures as opportunities rather than disasters. One of my personal favorite strategies is to encourage the use of the word "yet."  Working in pediatrics, it is a frequent experience that my patients may not have done an activity before - so when I ask them to try, sometimes they default to "I can't."  And I tell them, they need to try.  Maybe they can't complete that task, yet - but they need to try, and maybe they'll surprise themselves!

Module 2 dove into Critical Thinking. If we want to see change across PT and across healthcare, we have to start changing how we practice so that the field can catch up to our individual change.  We need to challenge the things we learn in school and we need to challenge our own thought processes in order to grow.  Critical Thinking is an umbrella term that really encompasses many concepts - including an open mindset (like module 1) and communication (the next two modules), but for me, the biggest part of critical thinking is to recognize our own biases and look for ways to disprove our own opinions and beliefs.  When I took Greg Lehman's "Reconciling Pain Science with Biomechanics" Class which I wrote about last week here, I asked him how he organized his learning because he reads SO MANY articles.  He told me that he will pick a topic and then collect several resources on that same topic looking for ways that his beliefs can be changed while reading the collection.  That is intentional critical thinking.

with Permission from the Level Up Initiative
Module 3 and 4: Communication
One of the recommended books for this topic was the toughest book I've read since "Explain Pain Supercharged," but once I got past the big words I needed to learn, I was really impressed by the brilliance of the book and by the importance of the concepts outlined in it.  Where does vulnerability fit into our careers as heathcare providers?  How much can we tolerate uncertainty?  We need to reflect on the care we provide so that we can identify our personal areas with room for growth.  We also need to recognize that our interactions with our patients are directly impacted by our own beliefs and the patient's beliefs.  The motivation of a patient will impact their participation in your home exercise program.  If it looks relevant to an activity they strongly want to return to, that's different than if your recommendations seem arbitrary and unable to help them achieve their goals.  If I believe that jumping up and down is going to help my patients and I can convince them to do it with intelligent rationale of how it will help them return to running, they're going to do it.  If my coworker uses a different approach, they're going to use an alternative treatment technique. Potentially neither of us wrong, but if the patient thinks my way is better, it will impact their care. Because of this, earning a patient's trust can really outweigh other things in care.  Remember, we're not treating robots.  To focus entirely on the objective and ignore what the patient thinks is going on with their own body, aka the subjective, leaves holes in their story and makes it harder for you to effectively treat patients.

So after four months and lots of new learning, I'm excited to share about the experience with you, and hope that if you're a new graduate PT, you'll consider participating in this mentorship program in the future.  Sign up this week, or wait until the next round.  Follow the Level Up Initiative on their social media sites, all linked above.  And then let me know what you think.  Tell them I sent you.

Friday, July 12, 2019

Megan Rapinoe Used to Hoop, too!

Summer is here!  The barbecues are starting, fireworks and mini American flags are on sale everywhere, and the sun is finally shining in Seattle with WNBA basketball under way.  I've taken the kayak out already and saw some seals and I've lost and found my sunglasses at least three times with the bipolar nature of the weather in Seattle. I've been working on a blog post about sport specialization for a while, and it has been  moving too slowly for me - primarily because I've been spending a lot less time at my computer and a lot more time in the sunshine when it comes out, but also because other topics just keep popping up that I want to write about. And then I decided I really wanted to write about the United States Women's Soccer Team this week, but... that's what everyone else has been doing.  And so, I decided to combine the two.


First,  I'll start with a definition.  In 2002, Jayanthi et al defined sport specialization as "intensive, year-round training in a single sport at the exclusion of other sports."  This came along with: “The American academy of pediatrics and the American medical society for sports medicine have both discouraged sport specialization before adolescence but acknowledge that this recommendation is largely based on expert opinion...” What does it mean?  It means that medical professionals are supporting playing multiple sports, moving in multiple different ways, participating in unorganized play that isn't a sport at all - just like playing games of tag or riding bikes around the neighborhood, or climbing a tree - so that the body moves in different ways.  


There are considerable benefits to playing sports.  Health benefits, of course, including improved heart rate and blood pressure, cardiovascular endurance, and muscular strength.  There are also mental health benefits, particularly with team sports - but also with individual sports - like community interactions, competitive spirit, sportsmanship, and having a support system.  But there are also risks.  That same article from Jayanthi also found that youth athletes with a higher socioeconomic status were more likely to sport specialize and were also more likely to experience more serious overuse injuries than lower socioeconomic status athletes.  It was also found that those youth athletes who participated in team sports tended to have less frequent overuse injuries than individual sports.

Myer et al provides some interesting statistics about the success from sport specialization: Approximately 30% of American kids specialize in one sport with the goal of earning a scholarship and reaching the professional level in that sport, but only .2-.5% make it to the elite levels. Many parents and, more dangerously, coaches believe that focusing on one sport is the way to reaching this goal.  But using the same patterns over and over again may not help develop resiliency and strength in other movement patterns. 

Some quotes from that paper:

"Single-sport specialization was first reported in Eastern Europe with athletes involved in individual sports such as gymnastics, swimming, diving, and figure skating."

"Vaeyens and colleagues59 reviewed the training history of 2004 Olympians and found that the mean age of sport initiation was 11.5 years."

"At the collegiate level, a study of National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division 1 athletes at one university found that 70% did not specialize in their sport until at least age 12 years, and 88% had participated in more than one sport."

Since I had already been doing research for a blog post on sports specialization, I looked into the roster of the USWNT and all the other sports those athletes played - other than soccer.  Here's what I've found.

Morgan Brian played varsity basketball through her senior year of high school before specializing in soccer.

Adrianna Franch was an all star high school basketball player.
Ashlyn Harris liked to surf and skateboard with her brother.
Tobin Heath reportedly likes tennis and surfing.
Jessica McDonald played four years of high school basketball and was a state champion and record holder in the 400m in track, also participating in the same three sports for two years of junior college before heading to North Carolina where she specialized.  The USWNT has a really long list of Tar Heels and a few Penn State Nittany Lions and Stanford Cardinal grads...I guess those would be the college power houses for women's soccer the way UConn is for women's basketball. 
Alex Morgan is listed as a multi-sport athlete.  As one of the most recognized athletes on the team, I think it's important to note that she tore her ACL when she was 17 and recovered to the extremely high level of play that she currently is at. In this chat, she says she started playing soccer around age 7 or 8, but played volleyball, basketball, and softball as well and didn't start playing club soccer until she was 14 years old.
Alyssa Naeher, my fellow Connecticut native, also played basketball in high school. 
Christen Press, (who I was insanely lucky to sit next to on a flight from Hartford to Chicago last summer in which the entire USWNT was on the plane and Sam Mewis sat behind us) played tennis and ran track before heading to Stanford for college. 
Megan Rapinoe played basketball and ran track.  
Becky Sauerbrunn also played basketball and volleyball. 


Megan Rapinoe celebrating the Storm Championship
Abby Dahlkemper, Tierna Davidson, Crystal Dunn, Julie Ertz, Lindsey Horan, Ali Krieger (did you know Krieger is German for warrior?!), Rose Lavelle, Carli Lloyd, Allie Long, Sam Mewis, Kelley O'Hara, Mallory Pugh, and Emily Sonnett - are not listed to play another sport on wikipedia, though that doesn't mean they didn't or haven't.  It most likely just means they didn't play another sport in high school and specialized before then, perhaps even playing something else through middle school.  Having ten out of 23 players noting what other sports they played until about age 18 has to help demonstrate the value in playing multiple sports!

So, what should we do about it?  We need to advocate for kids to play, to have recess, to move more, and to support participation in more than one sport.  My mentor from PT School, Lindsay DiStefano refers to this as Sport Sampling.  (I'm not sure if she coined this term, but it's the first place I ever heard it, and I like the idea - sample different activiites, find the ones you like, and move more!)  "Parents and educators should help provide opportunities for free unstructured play to improve motor skill development and youth should be encouraged to participate in a variety of sports during their growing years to influence the development of diverse motor skills" again Myer et al. 

And so, it's summer time.  Let your kids go out and play.  Run at the beach, play tag, kick a ball around, throw a frisbee, swim!  Don't let them play the same sports all year round.  And watch other sports too... like basketball, because now it's game time, and I'm off to go watch the Seattle Storm in action, hopefully with soccer star Megan Rapinoe in attendance!



Thursday, June 20, 2019

Physical Therapist Board Certification

On a dreary morning in March 2019, shortly after we lost an hour for daylight savings and my internal clock was thrown for a disastrous loop like it does every half-year, I turned off my three alarm clocks which were completely unnecessary because I hadn't slept a wink, crawled out of bed, and drove over to a ProMetrics testing center near my house to complete the Sports Certified Specialist Physical Therapist exam.  I had my photo identification, my registration paperwork, and a list of test day reminders: make sure you remove all jewelry before going through the metal detector, be prepared to pull up your shirt and pants sleeves and have your ears checked, bring water and snacks because your exam is seven hours long but you can have a break in the middle, and a bathroom will be available.

Now, here we are almost the end of June 2019, more than four months later, and today I received the results - I passed my test!  I was walking out of basketball practice with the Storm when I glanced at my phone and saw the email with this report.  Without the Storm, I would not have met the criteria to even take this exam, because you need sideline coverage hours in a contact sport, and lots of them.  I'm so grateful for them.  Per the rules of the examination and ProMetrics, I won't go into any details on the actual content of this test, but I wanted to discuss the preparations I used and what advanced certification as a physical therapist even means.  Fortunately, I wrote many of these thoughts in March, because there's no way I would have remembered them now!  But I couldn't get myself to share it, in case I hadn't actually passed the test!

What does it mean to be a Board Certified Physical Therapist?  Right now, if you go to PT school in the USA, you're going to graduate as a DPT - Doctor of Physical Therapy - but you are a generalist.  You've learned the basics of physical therapy for all the areas of specialty that a physical therapist can work in and you took a big, terrible test that shows you are competent to practice physical therapy.  That test would cover all the different areas of practice and is very broad, covering a lot of topics.  After graduation, a new grad physical therapist will get a job and, with or without intention - begin to specialize.  To some extent, your job may dictate your specialty because that's the area of practice you're going to focus learning about moving forward.   The beauty of this is that you're able to change the area of specialty by working in different settings and pursuing alternative continuing education, but it also means that when we first come out of school - or if we change work settings - we're not very experienced in that care area early on.

When I first graduated, I worked at an adult orthopedic clinic while picking up shifts in a skilled nursing facility.  I focused my learning on orthopedics because it was my interest, but I had to learn the basics of the rehabilitation center because the needs of those patients were different.  Another example - if you came into the rehab gym at Seattle Children's where I work, you would see physical therapists working with children who have developmental conditions, which looks entirely different from what the sports physical therapists, like me are doing.  We're working side by side, all physical therapists, doing entirely different things from the same generalist education. I'm in awe of their work every day... and it's so different!

In some ways, the pathway of a physical therapist mirrors how a physician (MD) completes their schooling.  Any doctor you have seen - your primary care or specialist - went to medical school and graduated as a generalist.  However they can't practice medicine that way.  They are required to continue on their education pathway into a residency, determined by an intense matching program that I'm incredibly thankful I did not have to endure. They will be matched into the field they will pursue and specialize in, like emergency medicine, cardiology, orthopedics, family medicine... that list is super long.  And then, after another several years of working in their specialty while learning on the job, they become a specialized physician and can practice in their field.  But they don't have the wiggle room to wake up in the morning and say - I don't like being a heart doctor anymore, so I'm going to study diabetes and be a doctor for that.  They're a bit more restricted in their careers.

I have read articles recommending that physical therapy transition into the medical school model, requiring residencies to specialize.  This is an option now, but it is not required.  A physical therapist currently has the option to specialize in nine different areas, and this can be done by either completing a residency program and taking a big test, or by meeting a list of requirements and taking the same big test.  This is the test I took earlier this year and have been tortured into waiting four months to get my results. The residency program is meant to give you the hands-on experience and focused training needed to pass the test, but you're able to test without the residency and achieve the same end-goal if you meet specified criteria.

In early 2014 I had applied for residencies in Sports Physical Therapy.  I wanted to work in sports and having had years of experience working with women's basketball and a shortage of physical therapists working with the WNBA, I felt this was the direction I needed to go in.  At the time, I think there were fifteen programs, but only three had options that were not soccer (none had options specific to women's sports) - and those were the programs I decided to apply to.  (No offense soccer, but I'm a fair weather sports girl.  I'll support the USWNT all day long and cheer and attend games when the sun is shining, but a year of sideline coverage in the rain was NOT on my To-Do list.)  And so - I applied to University of Southern California, Ohio State University, and Duke University.  (It would have killed my Husky Heart to be a Blue Devil a little bit, though the education would have been superb at all three institutions).  Needless to say, I was not selected for one of the few slots available, a very sad failure, but a few months later I managed to secure a spot in the WNBA without it, so I took the alternative route. 

The options for physical therapist specialist certification right now are: Cardiovascular/Pulmonary, Clinical Electrophysiology, Geriatrics, Neurology, Oncology, Orthopaedics, Pediatrics, Sports, Wound Management, and Women's Health.  The list of accredited residency programs is here for all the specialties.  A recent presentation I watched discussed focus on making a new specialty for Pain, which has not yet been established, but that seems like an interesting approach to try to advance the use of physical therapists in treating people with persisting pain. Since I've previously written about pain on many occasions, and I work with the Seattle Children's Chronic Pain Team, I'm excited to see if that will be specialty number ten.

A little about preparing for the exam:

The application deadline for the Sports specialty was July 31, 2018 to test in March 2019.  These dates have been consistent annually with all the specialties having application deadlines sometime in July the previous year for a March test date.  That means that if you want to take the test in 2020, you have 1 month to apply - or even less! The application process is pretty complicated for some of the specialties if you haven't completed a residency, so I advise you check it out soon.  All the information you could ever need is right here.

So, once you've applied, the American Board of Physical Therapy Specialties (ABPTS) reviews your qualifications to determine if you're eligible to take the test in your requested area.  That takes about 6 weeks.  I started studying when I applied, but I know others waited to make sure they could even take their exam.  Here's a look at how I prepared.

First, I gathered a bunch of materials to help me determine what content I needed to study.

The materials I used were:
1) The SCS Prep Course from MedBridge Education which has a nice table of contents covering all the content areas on the exam.  They have prep programs specific to many of the specialty areas.
2) I googled "SCS Residency Program Curriculum" on Google.  There are many, but I used this one which outlined a lot of the content topics.
3) I purchased "PT Sports Questions" by Matthew P. Brancaleone PT, DPT, SCS AT, CSCS" a question/answer book off Amazon for $35.
4) I already have my CSCS (Certified Strength and Conditioning Specialist) and the book "Essentials of Strength Training and Conditioning" and the study guide I made when preparing for that test.
5) I borrowed "The Fundamentals of Athletic Training" book from my boss
6) I found my course materials from the Emergency Management Course I took at REI which was a required pre-requisite to take the exam.
7) I borrowed the Manual of Structural Kinesiology from the Seattle Children's Inter Library Loan System for a review of anatomy and biomechanics basics, particularly with regard to the mechanics of the shoulder, and review of throwing motions and gait cycle.  My test was two weeks before giving this presentation at Seattle Children's so I was preparing for both at the same time.
8) Per the recommendations of the curriculum in #2, I secured copies of the National Athletic Training Association Position Statements, all of which are free here as well as many of their consensus statements and several of the APTA Clinical Practice Guidelines here.  The highlight of reading those was seeing how many of my UConn mentors were authors of them, including Lindsay DiStefano, Doug Casa, and Robert Huggins.  Man UConn puts out some amazing stuff!
9) Lastly, and probably most importantly, the Description of Specialty Practice (DSP) for my exam.  The APTA has a breakdown for each exam listing the material that would be covered on it. If you're approved to take the test, they send it to you as part of your application fee.  Or you can buy it before you apply.

Second, I took a practice test.  Right from the start.  The MedBridge Prep Course offered several practice exams that were shorter in duration than the actual test and covered a wide variety of topics.  Based on the results of my first practice test, where some of my outcomes were abysmal, I knew how to prioritize things.

Third, with my current skills clearly identified, and more importantly, my biggest weaknesses, I looked at this ginormous pile of stuff to read and the ~80 hours of online MedBridge videos available, and, I made a study schedule.  This is the same approach I took when studying for the PT licensing exam, so I was optimistic it could be successful again. I tried to cluster things together in a sensible way.  For example, when I read the chapter in the Athletic Training book about weather-related injuries like heat stroke or how to deal with lightning, I also read the NATA position statements related to the chapter, and then watched the Medbridge Video on that same topic.While I was studying the weather-related injuries, two quotes stuck out to me that I had saved for this post  With regard to cold-related illness: "Nobody is dead until they are warm and dead."  So, if you find someone buried in the snow, they're not dead until their body has been warmed up.  And with regard to lightning injuries, "In the contest between people and lightning, lightning always wins." So I got the repetitions for a topics and kept notes on things that I was unfamiliar with or wanted to come back to after I had gone through everything once.  Repetition is helpful for me, but also sometimes felt like I was beating a dead horse by the end of some of the longer (or less interesting) topics.

And then I took my test.  I'll be honest - I was behind on my schedule pretty much from the second week, but I just kept plugging along.  I had an excellent student in the clinic, who I wrote about here and here, and who was treating about half of my case load for several weeks leading up to the test, allowing me more time to devote to reading papers and studying.  I read A LOT of the materials listed above, but found some of it to be too inapplicable to the patient care I typically do, that I decided it was worth leaving out some chapters despite the risk of doing so.  I watched almost every single Medbridge course that was listed in their prep program, several just listening while I was driving, including most of the optional ones.  I was stuck on the Brooklyn Bridge for over an hour in traffic and watched an entire course on nutrition in that time.  And I was certain that I did not pass.  Today's news that I passed was super exciting.  Hopefully writing up my preparations will help someone else on their road to board certification.



Wednesday, February 13, 2019

Conflicted

Hey everyone.  This past week I've been conflicted with something I use in my patient care.  Conflicted enough that I've brought up this conversation with my coworkers and a close PT friend and it's still weighing heavily on my mind. So now it's here for others to read and comment on. Please send your thoughts, fellow PTs.

There is a physiotherapist out of the UK named Adam Meakins who posts regularly about various physical therapy topics including issues with the profession, our techniques, and our shortcomings. He goes by "The Sports Physio" and has a very respectable social media following: 54.4K twitter followers and 76,000 followers on his blog... compared to my 270 twitter followers and 9 blog followers (plus my mom).  I present these numbers for the sole purpose of demonstrating that he's a well-known PT.  I have followed him and read his materials for about a year and have come to find that he challenges my thought processes, which is essential for my growth, though sometimes is hard to swallow.
ID 2530204


In the past week, two physical therapists who I respect - but also occasionally differ in opinion with - have mentioned Adam Meakins. One of them linked to a video Adam posted on Facebook which he further discussed in this recent blog post and he was also interviewed on this podcast about a different subject - so he's just come up a lot more this week than usual and his messages have been on my mind.

This post is not meant to be an attack on Adam.  He works hard to improve healthcare and physical therapy practices - noble efforts with messages I often agree with.  He expresses his perspectives confidently in an unapologetic abrasive manner that has a certain appeal for getting his message across.  (AKA - there's no bullshit.  He tells it like he sees it.  I love this about him.) He's a physio and he's trying to help people live healthier lives doing the things they love to do... so I respect him. I have never met him in person (yet), but I do pay attention to what he's posting because I think his perspective is really valuable, even if mine differs, like it does right now.  I wonder what it would be like to shadow him treating patients for a day.

The blog (and video) he posted discuss the use of palpation (evaluative touch) and how we present our findings to patients.  

Adam listed multiple studies as his references, many of which I have now read, which report that either more research is needed or that palpation techniques are not reliable. To my knowledge, there are not many papers that say the opposite, and my skills of critically appraising research are certainly inferior to Adam's, but this paper contradicts the research presented in Adam's blog post.  I had to search to find that one.  I searched because I have found multiple occasions where someone has told me to do something with patients because they read an article about it - and I was able to find multiple publications that stated the opposite information.  So when I read his post and immediately felt like it didn't sit right with me, I had to do some searching. Maybe I don't understand his message properly.  Maybe I'm too biased to see through my own thought processes.  Regardless, I am conflicted.

Adam points out that physical therapists are not good at palpating things like "knots" or "trigger points" or "tight bands" or "joint play at the spine" and that we are not consistent between providers or even consistent with our own practices.  In non-medical terms - if you smell pizza in the morning and identify that it is, in fact, pizza - but in the afternoon smell the same exact thing and identify it as a cheeseburger, you're not being consistent with your own findings.  And to tell someone that you have a cheeseburger when it's actually a pizza could be confusing or problematic.  Scientific research says that physical therapists touch patients to evaluate them but report different findings. The research also says that we cannot identify if parts of the spine moves abnormally or identify which level of the spine we're touching with consistent results.

Now... when I palpate a patient and feel like a segment of their lumbar spine feels hypomobile, I agree with Adam that it makes no sense for me to state the specific level of the spine to the patient, because I don't have XRAY vision to know I'm 100% accurate and, working with kids, it probably doesn't have much meaning to them anyways.  I worked with a patient with neck pain today and, as I've previously mentioned, I currently have a student.  So when I palpated a segment that I thought was hypomobile (and reproduced the patient's symptoms), I relayed to my student that she should look around where C3 would likely be because I can't actually be certain that it is C3.  I think it is, I'll document it as such, but the reality is - I don't actually care exactly what level it is.  I feel something, it reproduces my patient's symptoms, it's where I want to treat.  I don't know how I could have better directed my student to what I found for her to feel it herself, but the patient felt relief with mobilizations at this region.  Adam's post suggests that this confirms my bias to this being a useful technique.

Maybe it's more about the way the care is interpreted and explained to the patient than the actual identification of specific structures and the interventions that are applied that Adam has a problem with.  I agree with him that we really need to STOP TELLING PEOPLE their L5 is rotated or their back is out. What does it mean for you to throw your back out?  That is not medical terminology.  Can your back ever be in?

But... when I palpate, particularly at the spine, I do feel "something." Of course I'm biased on my opinion of my own patient care...it would be wrong of me to use interventions that I did not believe were helpful and, since I also manipulate the spine on occasion, I feel it is essential for me to use palpation to identify hypomobile segments of the spine.  I feel hypomobility in some regions compared to other regions in the same person.  While I don't generally compare spinal mobility person to person because I don't find that useful, I do correlate certain patient responses with what I'm feeling in soft tissues in my hands and compare that to what I've felt with others.  If a person laying on the table in front of me presents with a neck that is tender to palpation and their cervical and thoracic spine feel stiff compared to their lumbar spine, I want to treat this issue.  Maybe with manual therapy.  Maybe with exercise.  Maybe with both.

I used to do things very differently.  I no longer say to my patients, "Wow your neck is really stiff," or "Your 1st rib is stuck"- though I do sometimes feel a stiff neck and a hypomobile first rib... which I treat.  I don't say these things any more because it freaked out the patients.  They'd worry about their rib being a problem.

I used to look at the pelvis and tell patients that they had one leg longer than the other. All the time.  Guilty. I didn't know better, then! I used long axis distraction of a leg to distract the hip while simultaneously re-aligning the SI Joint.  That's what I truly believed.  I'm telling you that I used to regularly yank on people's legs. Maybe as often as daily. Wanna know why I did it so much?  Because sometimes IT ACTUALLY WORKED.  And they felt better.  And that's a bit of what Adam Meakins is saying... that we can be convinced that the care we're providing is beneficial, even when it is not supported by research. I eventually learned that it didn't work as much as I thought it did.  It didn't help enough people.  It could have been harmful to the patients and I constantly felt like I was doing something to patients to try to fix them rather than guiding them towards ways to fix themselves.

Humans can't be symmetrical if we have hand dominance and we move to get in and out of a car in the same way all the time but less frequently on the other side of the car. Our heart is not centered in our chest cavity.  There is only one spleen and one liver and they're not in the middle perfectly symmetrical....  So while Adam Meakins is practically pleading with physical therapists (and hopefully chiropractors and physicians) to STOP telling our patients that they have anatomical problems that are probably not actually problems, and I agree with that message... I still feel "something" when I palpate the spine.

If patients ask, I now use an explanation about the nervous system having a reason to try to protect that particular region of the body and that by using load management strategies, it may calm down. I explain that "hurt does not equal harm"... that the tissues of the body may hurt even though damage is not occurring.  The body uses pain to protect itself.  And then I give a home exercise program to guide them on restoring motion, strength, or function based on what I determine the patient needs... which I did by using palpation.

I remember sitting in PT school and being taught how to palpate the multifius and the transverse abdominus musculature to assess if they're contracting.  I could never feel the multifidi.  Never.  And then the PTs at my first job out of PT school encouraged me to focus on assessing the multifidi in various positions and using abdominal bracing and using electric stimulation in conjunction with abdominal bracing on my patients.  I tried to use that.  But I could not feel it.  This is what Adam seems to be describing but relevant to palpating the spine.  Is it possible that we have different skills with regard to palpation?  Is it possible that while I cannot feel the multifidi, I could feel hypomobility at the spine?  Is it possible that the issue is not about what we identify, but more in how we express it to our patients?  We are definitely impacting the beliefs of the patients we see.

The podcast interview goes a bit more into the discussion of the narratives that physical therapists (and healthcare providers) present to their patients and how this can negatively impact them.  I like that Adam states in the podcast that removal of pain is the wrong way for PT to be going as a profession.  We need to be empowering patients, give them realistic expectations, and help them operate within the constraints that their individual bodies allow.  The goal should be developing resilience and tolerance - not elimination of pain.  I agree with Adam on all these points.

I also agree that we are over-treating patients.  Too many visits.  Too many referrals from person to person rather than really understanding what's going on.
I also agree that the medical system doesn't operate in an ideal fashion.  Insurance companies limiting treatment influence the care that patients get.  This is wrong.
I also agree that sometimes the best treatment for a patient is NO TREATMENT.  I recently was working with a patient who was seeing so many different providers that I just sat her down and told her - I think you're trying to find too many solutions to a small number of problems and can't follow a single path to your recovery.  I recommended that she sit down and write a list of all the people she had been seeking answers from, and pick the one that she wanted to commit to.  Who do you believe is helping you?  Follow that person.  Get rid of the rest of us.  Everyone telling you different things is confusing and ineffective.   I don't actually care if physical therapy is her solution.  The best solution for every patient is the one they buy into and helps them find a way to get back to their function.  Period.

Even as I write this, I'm feeling my thought processes shift about what I say, but I"m not ready to throw away palpation yet.  I like that I'm trained to provide spine manipulations and have had some really great results using it. I use it selectively and in conjunction with movement.  And so, I'm unwilling to throw away a tool from my toolbox that I sometimes find essential.  At least for now.

Take Home Message: There are lots of really good physical therapists out there, many of which are creating content that is easily accessible and easy to apply.  The messages differ between them.  But patient populations differ and you have to believe in what you're selling to your patients.  I believe in a little Mike Reinold and a little Lenny Macrina and a little Lorimer Moseley and a little Adam Meakins and then I add some strength and conditioning with Eric Cressey and a little breathing from yoga practices and a little mental health... and I'm my own unique clinical provider because of all those influences... which is why I keep writing about all of them!  So use a variety of backgrounds and consider opposing opinions, try out different techniques, challenge your own beliefs and welcome growth along with failure.  Feel free to tell me if I'm wrong... I may not like that, but I'd like to think I'll be respectful and consider the alternatives.

Above all else - Do No Harm.


Thursday, December 27, 2018

2018 Year in Review

The last blog post of 2018! Since I started writing in November 2017, Abby's World has had 14,000 visitors.  I still don't like the title... Some posts were really popular... four posts had over 400 readers, others had less interest... and that's ok.  I think it's safe to say that I'm still figuring things out a bit to narrow down the scope, but I'm enjoying the variety of topics right now.  Thank you, so much, to everyone who has stopped by! I hope you've learned something and that I've been helpful to you in some way.

Today's post will serve as recap of 2018 - both personally and professionally - and a look back at some of my favorite posts of 2018.  As for 2019, I don't think I'm going to write a plan or set goals - other than to keep writing.
The Seattle Storm and UConn Connection
My 2018 biggest moments:
I'll start with the Seattle Storm winning the WNBA Championship, which I wrote about here.  I was so fortunate to be able to attend WNBA Finals Game 3 in Washington, D.C. with my brother, and still love basketball despite my poor skills at playing the game. I'm already looking forward to next season and it's still several months away.

Dear Evan Hansen, New York City, July 2018
As great as the championship was, my family celebrated a huge milestone this year.  In May, my niece and nephew became B'nai Mitzvah, which is a Jewish coming-of-age or right of passage.  They're thirteen years old, now!  The actual events for the B'Nai Mitzvah were incredible and I'm so proud of them for their accomplishment and hard work, but more special was the opportunity to celebrate them each in their own individual way.  I asked them a few months before-hand what they would want most, and I love how different they are and what they chose.  I celebrated my niece by taking her, my sister, and my mom to see the musical Dear Evan Hansen in New York City.  If you haven't heard much about this story, I encourage you to check it out, particularly if you have teenagers in the house. I'm so glad we could do that together, and that it was what she wanted to do - with her aunt, mom, and grandma.  I celebrated my nephew at the Denver Broncos versus Seattle Seahawks game in Denver, CO.  He's been a Broncos fan since birth because he liked the color orange and had always wanted to see their stadium.  As a sports fan myself, I really loved watching him experience something he had wanted to so much... and the rivalry of rooting for opposite teams but in a mature manner.  It was a chance to spend time with my favorite people as they head into teenage-hood and, soon, adulthood.  Next year they'll both attend Cheshire High School, the same school I graduated from fifteen years ago.  I remember holding them when they were born and all of these events were a flood of pride and emotions.   Because of them, I spent more quality time with my family in 2018 than I had since I moved to Seattle.  That was the best part of 2018.
Seattle Seahawks @ Denver Broncos, September 2018
Some of my other favorite things from 2018 that have nothing to do with Physical Therapy:
I saw the Goo Goo Dolls perform their 20th Anniversary celebration of Dizzy Up The Girls.
I rode in a helicopter for the first time. Total trip time was about 3 minutes.  It was awesome.
I read the first five books of the Harry Potter Series and watched the first three movies... my first time for all of that.  Don't worry, book six is in progress and I'll finish all of it in 2019.
I read a lot of books in 2018, actually.  Some really deep, sciency stuff.  Some much lighter and more relaxing.  I have come to embrace the audio book for commutes. I read The Origin of Species which I wrote about here and definitely do not recommend others read, but feel like I can read anything if I could get through that.
I got addicted to yoga.  And then dropped out of yoga.  I miss yoga.

My 2018 Physical Therapy Continuing Education was primarily focused on three areas.
1) Orthopedics from Mike Reinold, Lenny Macrina, and Eric Cressey.  I took Mike's shoulder seminar, which I wrote about here, Lenny's knee seminar which I wrote about here (and his elbow course), and Eric's shoulder course which I wrote about here.  I'm so grateful that there are mentors willing to share their expertise and knowledge online, and who also have made trips out to the West Coast for me to learn from in person.

2) Chronic Pain, primarily from Lorimer Moseley and Adriaan Louw.  I've written about those experiences here - from reading Explain Pain, and here from reading Explain Pain Supercharged and from meeting Lorimer Moseley at his presentation at the University of Washington.  Starting in two weeks, I'll be working with the Seattle Children's Pain Clinic as part of a collaborative team to help kids experiencing chronic pain.  I'm looking forward to putting all that learning to good use.

3) Strength and Conditioning.  I passed the CSCS (Certified Strength and Conditioning Specialist) exam in 2018, which I wrote about here and took a Medbridge Education Course instructed by Sue Falsone on this topic as well.  This has definitely made an impact on how I treat patients, specifically by loading them more and manipulating rep/set schemes a little bit more than I did in the past.  A few PTs have asked me if I thought this process was worth it, and for my patient population and side gigs, I feel that it is definitely useful.  I work in Pediatric Sports Medicine so my patient population is mostly athletic and getting back to sports.  They've generally never worked with a strength and conditioning coach or a physical therapist and don't understand any of the key basics of movement or how the body works.  I love having this background knowledge to educate them!

I feel like I spent a lot of time working towards growing as a physical therapist in 2018, but when I look back, it wasn't even close to what was most important.

Looking forward to 2019:  I'd be lying if I pretended that 2018 was perfect. Social media sometimes has that impact...  nobody posts their tears and struggles on Facebook and Instagram.  I certainly only post the happy times and the beauty I see around me. In truth, 2018 was a hard year.  I'm not sure 2019 will be easier... but there will be more family time and more hard work and growth.  And for all that, I'm grateful.

Happy New Year!

Thursday, December 13, 2018

Becoming a Clinical Instructor

UConn PT at the Golden Gate Bridge, (Thanks, EL!)
It's finally happened.  The University of Connecticut Department of Physical Therapy must have experienced a temporary moment of insanity because they're sending me a student!  A moldable young mind on her path to becoming a physical therapist with aspirations of working in pediatric orthopedics... and since I was willing to take her, they found a way to get a contract with Seattle Children's Hospital.

Connecticut is a small state with five PT schools, so pretty much all of my classmates had to do at least one rotation out of state because there aren't enough spots for everyone to stay close to home for all those students.  And if you have specific interests like pediatrics, your options are even less.  It provided for opportunities to learn about different cultures around the country and different methods and random meet ups with classmates.  I had two rotations in Connecticut, one in Albuquerque, NM, and one in Denver, CO... and my classmates went to New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Arizona, Florida, California, Texas, Utah, New York... and maybe even more places I can't remember! 

I'm super excited to mentor a student. It feels like a way to give back to my alma mater while also having the opportunity to learn from someone who's reading current research and will have their own perspectives on optimal patient care.  I recently read a post in a Physical Therapy Facebook Group from someone about to take their first student and they were looking for advice in how to prepare.  I've also been asking around and reflecting on my own clinical experiences and instructors. I can easily think of some things that went well for me and others that weren't so great.

So, in preparation for her arrival, here are four things I'm hoping to focus on to help her have the best clinical experience possible... and then after she's all done, we can come back and see how it went!

1) Feedback:
I personally don't take feedback well.  Positive or negative.  I don't really like having much praise and I don't like hearing what I did poorly. On one of my clinical rotations, my CI gave me feedback in front of a patient that didn't sit well with me, and when we discussed it later on, privately, I burst into tears. (One of the comments on the Facebook Group was to prepare for tears because a lot students cry from the stress... but I'm not so sure). Talk about a moment severely lacking in professionalism! Embarrassing. As such, I am very aware of the importance of private feedback - unless there is a safety issue.  But being aware of that importance and being able to save feedback until a later time doesn't always occur.

Part of being a clinical instructor is helping a student develop their clinical thought processes for how they evaluate and treat patients.  Feedback is a necessary component of that, and sometimes has to be done in front of the patient - but it can be done in a right way that doesn't scare the student or patient.  From what I've observed by coworkers who have had students, there is definitely an art form to being a good clinical instructor. 

And the feedback goes both ways!  Taking a student gives me more opportunities to have my methods questioned and receive feedback about how I interact with patients and find new ways to improve my own skills. This article discusses bi-directional feedback and explains how when both the student and instructor give feedback to one another, the experience is optimized for both people and there is enhanced learning. How to give the feedback is of course an important consideration.  And when.  Because providing feedback too quickly limits opportunities for students to make mistakes.  And people tend to learn best from their mistakes... as long as the patients aren't going to get hurt.

2) Communication: 
Obviously this aligns with feedback, but deserves its own space.  With my own clinical rotations, I didn't feel like I learned most from treating the patients.  I learned far more from discussing why I chose the interventions I used, studying about techniques or conditions I was unfamiliar with, observing interactions between providers and patients, and trying different things.  Fortunately, I'm a talker, so discussing cases and thought processes came fairly easy to me. Conversely, listening is the bigger challenge for me.  I'm hoping that being an instructor will help me work on my active listening skills, particularly not interrupting mid-conversation.
UConn PT at the Grand Canyon

Communication also includes outlining expectations.  This includes small things like the schedule we'll follow and how to address patients and parents up to more critical considerations such as the sufficient knowledge for patient care.  Preparing for weekly follow up sessions to discuss progress and goals for the upcoming week was essential for my success.  Scheduled meetings are useful, in my opinion, to regularly check in, develop goals, refer back to expectations, and measure progress. I like organization and efficiency, so my instructor who was not very efficient was more challenging to learn from than the more organized CIs.

Also, as I've now had a few PT jobs and seen numerous ways to "skin a cat", I'm becoming more comfortable with the fact that physical therapists can treat differently and still be impactful.  There are exercises or techniques I don't use or I don't like... for whatever reason... but that doesn't mean others can't use them if their reasoning makes sense.  Sometimes I share patients with a coworker and we do things in very different ways... but as long as the patient continues to get better, I have to be willing to recognize that there are multiple roads to recovery.  

3) Practicing skills:
One of the best pieces of advice I got from a clinical instructor was to find a system that I could do well to use for evaluating patients as a starting point.  I could vary from that system as I got more and more comfortable, but I had to have a fall-back in case the patient didn't progress the way I would expect them to.  For me, that system was the SFMA, Selective Functional Movement Assessment, and I still sometimes fall back onto it (or parts of it) now! I wrote about that experience here.  I practiced the assessment on my roommates and on my clinical instructor and read the book on how it worked and also used it on a large number of patients.  Then, towards the end of my rotation, I was able to evaluate patients without using the SFMA, unless I wasn't sure what was going on, and then easily went back to what I felt I was good at.

In addition to evaluation techniques, in the pediatric population I don't find myself using a lot of manual therapy - but there are certain times when I feel it is necessary.  When I was learning manual skills, I needed my instructor to do them to me and have me do the technique back to them.  This way, I could get feedback on my positioning and pressure, but I would also need to use it fairly soon in order to have any retention.  I know that we used down time to practice various special tests, but if I didn't end up needing them for a whole week, it was hard to recall that knowledge later on.  

4) Providing Resources:
One of the suggestions made on the Facebook post came from a student suggesting to provide a few articles that demonstrate some of the mindset and practices the instructor uses.  I found this interesting, because only one of my instructors gave me resources at the beginning of my affiliation and that was, without question, my best experience.  I have some ideas of articles that I've read that have been impactful to my practice, but I don't know that I feel a need to start off that way.  I'd rather see if we think similarly first and share them if we don't, I think... but in the month until she begins, I'm going to give this some extra thought.  

Key resources don't just include papers to read.  I work with a group of incredibly talented practitioners including my sports physical therapist team, but multiple other types of providers share our space.  There are opportunities with other types of rehab specialists as well as providers outside our space but within the company relevant to PT practice that will also help a student grow. Should my student have interests in learning about additional experiences, I'm hopeful that I will be able to help arrange those opportunities. 

Overall, I'm excited to learn as much as I am to teach.  Especially since I'm getting a Connecticut Husky.  I hope she brings a hoodie to take a picture of in front of the Space Needle!